humble comment

Sara Stanley comments on CEOs pledge to reinvest any tax cuts

I was horrified to read the leading article in the AFR of 22 March 2018 ‘CEOs pledge to reinvest any tax cuts’. It goes on to report that the Business Council of Australia leadership plus ten chief executive officers of large companies sent a letter to all senators saying greater investment meant higher wages.

They wrote ‘We believe that a reduction in the corporate tax rate, as proposed through the government’s enterprise tax plan, is urgent and vital to keep Australia competitive. If the Senate passes this important legislation we, as some of the nations largest employers, commit to invest more in Australia which will lead to employing more Australians and therefore stronger wage growth as the tax cuts take effect.’

Leaving aside the real issue, which is tax reform, see the forgotten Henry Report, it is hard to believe that any sensible politicians will fall for this nonsense.

If the tax cuts are intended to lead to more jobs, higher wages and to better conditions for employees then at the very least our politicians should expect big business to give more specific guarantees in that regard. Senator Derryn Hinch wants a legislated guarantee if he agrees to the proposed legislation which the government and big business say is an unrealistic demand.

If you were to ask some employees what they would like they might say
provide more full-time employment and reduce casual employment. They could suggest that executive salaries, including bonuses, should be a reasonable multiple of wages. They might request more resources be put into the education and development of staff to ensure they remain abreast of technological developments. They might mention maternity leave, child care and family adjustment leave.

They might also ask for more sensible politicians.


  1 comment for “Sara Stanley comments on CEOs pledge to reinvest any tax cuts

  1. Wendy Mayer
    25/03/2018 at 4:40 pm

    Collecting information from Facebook users and selling it on to political systems is an indication of the currently discussed threat to democratic government. The transfer of power from the democratic political systems to capital should be of concern to all democracies.

    The article discussing corporate tax cuts refers to 10 Ceo’s of large companies and the Australian Business Council directly contacting senators about tax concessions to business. These businesses stated the possible concessions they will make if the tax reductions are passed.

    If these tax concessions are to be passed by the government, it is the government that should be stating the requirements such beneficiaries will have to meet not the companies.

    Surely this is a classic example of capital telling the democratically elected politicians what to do and defining their concession should the government do as it’s told.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.